From
, passed during the 2015 legislative session, is a sweeping law pitched as part of a broader $800 million border security effort. It expands the border presence of the Texas National Guard, green-lights hiring more troopers, and mandates an intelligence center to analyze crime data at the border.One of the law鈥檚 other provisions has that's just now making headlines. The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, better known as , has over what's called the 鈥渋mmigrant harboring鈥� provision. They argue that it's unconstitutional under federal law.
Thomas Saenz, MALDEF鈥檚 president and general counsel, said in a recent news release that the law embroils Texas in litigation and 鈥�(divides) the state in the name of political gamesmanship.鈥�
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two San Antonio landlords, David Cruz and Valentin Reyes, who say the law could hurt them. Cruz and Reyes say they don鈥檛 usually question their tenants鈥� immigration statuses. If they had to comply with the law, they would be required to ask lease signers of their legal status and could lose tenants. If they didn鈥檛 inquire, Cruz and Reyes could be arrested.
Those who pushed for the law back during the legislative session say there's a public safety function here. Underlying the bill鈥檚 language is a seeming effort to crack down on human trafficking. The bill charges anyone caught shielding someone who is here illegally with a felony.
, a professor at Texas A&M University School of Law, says that it鈥檚 not at all clear whether laws like this one are leaning more toward combating human trafficking, so much as trying to catch immigrants who are undocumented.
鈥淏ased on Gov. Abbott's own statements, the bill seems to be aimed at just simply objecting to the federal government's failure to control the situation,鈥� Rambo says. 鈥淭exas is 鈥� for lack of a better phrase 鈥� in a state of revolt about how the federal government is handling immigration."
Federal law trumps any state law on a similar subject. That鈥檚 what MALDEF is hoping to get a ruling on for this section of House Bill 11.
"It's not an aspect of equal protection, it's an aspect of preemption under the supremacy clause,鈥� Rambo says. 鈥淭he complaint in this case is that there are already federal harboring provisions and that those are completely adequate to deal with human trafficking.鈥�
Copyright 2020 KUT 90.5. To see more, visit . 9(MDAxODQzOTgwMDEyMTcyNjI4MTAxYWQyMw004))
