四虎影院

Will a statewide ban on texting-while-driving replace ordinances already on the books in cities across Texas? 

As Texas cities boom, safety concerns grow

Kathy Sokolic, a 40-year-old realtor from Austin, lives about 3 miles from downtown. Her hip, rapidly-redeveloping area is quickly filling with shops, restaurants, families, and traffic. Lots of traffic. 

鈥淪afety on neighborhood streets is incredibly important to me,鈥� she says.

For good reason: Sokolic鈥檚 family lives nearby. Last September her nine-year-old nephew was hit by a truck driving past his home.

鈥淎pparently the driver wasn鈥檛 texting, but this was I mean in a neighborhood in front of a child鈥檚 home and he鈥檚 severely disabled now,鈥� she says.

Sokolic knows distracted driving increases the risk of accidents like these. So she was glad last month when Gov. Greg Abbott signed a statewide ban on texting while driving into law.

What happens now for the statewide ban on texting-while-driving?

But then, then Sokolic heard Abbott announcing a special session, where he said this:

Abbott also said he wasn鈥檛 satisfied with how the law was written. 

For our statewide  : A Very Special Session series, we're answering listeners questions about this summer's legislative over time. Kathy Sokolic asked us whether the texting ban legislation is going "to stay intact" during the special session.

The short answer is, probably yes. The statewide ban should go into effect on September 1.

The long answer is more complicated.  Local ordinances that are more strict, like the 鈥渉ands-free only" driving rules already in place in Austin, El Paso and San Antonio could be in trouble.

It's all about local control.

Many of the items Gov. Abbott says he wants lawmakers to address in the next few weeks would in some way limit local government鈥檚 power.  

鈥淭here鈥檚 really a struggle over the future of our state with this special session, are we going to continue to grow and progress and have cities that drawing people by the thousands or are we going to put clamps on all of that,鈥� Jeff Coyle says.

Coyle is director of government and public affairs for the City of San Antonio. He says cities should have the freedom to decide what drivers do with devices when they鈥檙e driving in city limits.

Other special session issues of interest to San Antonio include the Governor鈥檚 push to limit when a city can annex an adjacent community and limiting cities ability to set property tax rates. Coyle says the majority of money cities take in from local property taxes goes to pay for public safety needs, like hiring additional police officers or emergency personnel.

The big question: Who gets to decide what cities can regulate?

City-dwellers like Emily Hatbermehl appreciate those services and says it'd be worth it to pay more taxes for them.

鈥淚n my own personal experience anytime I, unfortunately, had to call 911, I always got a really quick response," she says.

As Hatbermehl loads her two children in the car before heading to daycare, she says she likes that Austin's 鈥渉ands-free鈥� driving rule goes farther than the state鈥檚 new ban.

鈥淭o go down to just texting doesn鈥檛 make a lot of sense.  Because in theory someone gets pulled over they say, 鈥榳ell, I was just talking on the phone, or I was just looking at a map鈥�," she says. "Why not go all the way?"

But local control critics say it鈥檚 gotten out of control. 

鈥淪o the local government is chasing its tail with more and more ordinances that raise costs more and more," says Don Zimmerman, a former Austin city council member and director of the non-profit, anti-tax Travis County Taxpayers Union. "Austin is a mess, and if we need adult supervision from the state then so be it."

Who will prevail? City or State? If most lawmakers see it from Zimmerman鈥檚 point of view this special session, cities could lose a lot more than the power to tell you to put down that phone when you鈥檙e in the car.  

Copyright 2020 Texas Public Radio. To see more, visit .