A top Texas senator filed legislation Monday that would extend the state鈥檚 ban on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives to K-12 public schools.
Sen. , the Conroe Republican who chairs the Senate Committee on Education K-16, introduced both and after Gov. Greg Abbott expressed support in his State of the State address earlier this month for Texas banning diversity practices across its more than 1,200 public school districts.
鈥淚t鈥檚 clear these programs are already in our schools using millions of taxpayer dollars meant for the classroom to fund political activism and political agendas,鈥� Creighton said during a Senate Committee on Education K-16 hearing Thursday.
The introductory text in the legislation suggests school districts that fail to comply with the proposed DEI ban could lose out on funding, but neither bills specify how that would happen. Public schools receive funding primarily from local property taxes and the state budget.
Following the bill filing Monday, Erin Daly Wilson, the communications director for Creighton鈥檚 office, told The Texas Tribune that the bill would not withhold funding from school districts that violate the law.
SB 12, dubbed by Creighton the 鈥淧arental Bill of Rights,鈥� would still make it illegal for Texas school districts to factor in diversity, equity and inclusion in hiring and employment decisions. It would prevent schools from developing policies, programs and training that reference race, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation. It would require districts to create policies for disciplining employees who engage in or assign DEI-related tasks to others. And it would ban classroom instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation.
SB 1565 builds on that proposal by allowing parents to submit complaints to principals about alleged DEI violations and requiring school officials to offer parents an explanation of their response to the complaint. Parents could appeal the school鈥檚 response to the Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath, who the bill requires to assign an arbitrator to review the complaint and conduct a hearing.
If education officials rule against a school district, the measure would require the superintendent to testify before the State Board of Education about the findings and the number of complaints against that district.
Advocates of the bills argued during Thursday鈥檚 hearing that DEI policies in public schools are not effective, waste taxpayer money and create division. Julie Pickren, a member of the State Board of Education, said Thursday that DEI programs 鈥渕ay appear well intentioned,鈥� but they do more harm than good.
鈥淒EI fosters a culture of entitlement and disappointments that will steal the American dream from kids,鈥� Pickren said. 鈥淓very minute that we spend on 鈥榳oke鈥� DEI indoctrination is a minute that we are not teaching a child how to read or how to do math.鈥�
Opponents of both bills testified that students from underrepresented groups would be hurt the most by a potential ban, including Black students and LGBTQ+ children. Critics say the ban could also make it more difficult for the state to recruit new teachers.
Sarai Flores, a policy fellow for the Mexican American School Board Association, testified Thursday that the ban would make it more difficult for schools to hire educators that reflect the communities they teach in. Though about three quarters of all public school students in the state are people of color, the majority of teachers in the state are white, according to .
SB 12 would ban schools from factoring in diversity, equity and inclusion in hiring and employment decisions. That restriction would come as the state is facing a shortage of teachers without formal classroom training. Nearly in Texas schools during the 2023-24 academic year lacked a state teaching teaching certification.
The bill, which Flores also called 鈥渧ague and restrictive,鈥� might also prevent teachers from having important discussions about race, history and identity due to the fear that they might violate the law, she added.
Other criticisms also centered on SB 12鈥檚 proposed ban on classroom instruction on gender identity or sexual orientation, reminiscent of the 2022 Florida that gained national attention. Several testified against that part of the bill Thursday, saying it would further negative stigmas toward LGBTQ+ students.
Dash Kostka, a student at the University of Texas in Austin, said LGBTQ+ students would be more likely to have mental health crises or face bigotry if teachers are banned from teaching about sexual orientation.
鈥淟iberals like me are not trying to teach intersectional queer theory to your middle schoolers,鈥� Kostka said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e not trying to turn your kids gay.鈥�
Neither of the proposals would prevent schools 鈥渇rom acknowledging or teaching the significance of state and federal holidays or commemorative months鈥� or teaching how those holidays or months fit into Texas and U.S. history, according to the legislation.
The Texas Tribune reached out to several school districts to discuss the proposals Wednesday. At least one declined to comment, while others did not respond immediately.
Texas school districts oversee offices and programs responsible for helping ensure students of color, children learning English, kids from immigrant families, students with disabilities and others receive support and feel included on their campuses. Children of color comprise the overwhelming majority of Texas鈥� 5.5 million student population.
Jonathan Feinstein, state director for The Education Trust, told The Texas Tribune that it鈥檚 also unclear how a DEI ban could impact public school districts鈥� abilities to close achievement gaps among students. Under federal law, the state has a responsibility to close achievement gaps between students of different ethnic and racial backgrounds, he said. In Texas, Black and Latino students are more likely to read below grade level than their white counterparts.
鈥淲ould districts or poor charter schools be restricted from setting goals to explicitly close these gaps by improving academic outcomes for underperforming students?鈥� Feinstein said.
Antonio Ingram, a lawyer at the NAACP鈥檚 Legal Defense Fund, testified Thursday against SB 12, saying it would harm all students, but especially Black students. He said that DEI programs are meant to 鈥渞emediate disparities鈥� that are present because of past segregation. A number of programs that benefit Black students could be on the chopping block, Ingram said, if the DEI ban moves forward.
鈥淪B 12 may cause middle school administrators to curtail mentorship programs encouraging Black girls to pursue careers like engineering or medicine,鈥� Ingram said. 鈥淪B 12 may cause high school counselors to discontinue implicit bias training [that helps] to prevent Black boys from receiving unjust discipline.鈥�
Lawmakers in support of SB 12 and SB 1565, including Creighton, see it as an extension of the state鈥檚 in K-12 public schools and a ban of DEI programs and policies in Texas鈥� public universities.
Critical race theory is a college-level discipline that examines why racism continues in American law and culture decades after the civil rights movement in the United States. It is not taught in elementary or secondary schools in Texas but some conservatives use the term to describe what they see as a liberal bent in the way race and racism is taught in public schools.
During the 2023 legislative session, Texas passed a law diversity offices, programs and training at publicly-funded universities. The law has caused among university employees and students, while colleges have shuttered DEI offices and efforts. Those offices also aimed to help Black, Latino, LGBTQ+ and other underrepresented students adjust to life on college campuses and foster a sense of community among their peers.
Abbott has since called on lawmakers to ensure that 鈥渘o taxpayer dollars will be used to fund DEI鈥� in K-12 public education.
鈥淪chools must not push woke agendas on our kids,鈥� Abbott said during his State of the State address in early February. 鈥淪chools are for education, not indoctrination.鈥�
Those efforts mirror attempts to eliminate diversity at the federal level. On Feb. 14, the U.S. Department of Education issued a letter to schools across the country giving them to ban such efforts on their campuses and threatening a loss of funding if schools don鈥檛 comply. That window of time ends Friday.
Republicans nationally and in Texas often refer to any school activities attempting to create a more inclusive environment for children 鈥� such as teaching about systemic racism or allowing students to check out library books that center LGBTQ+ characters 鈥� as so-called 鈥渨oke鈥� liberal indoctrination.
State officials鈥� attempts to extend the diversity ban come as lawmakers continue to push for greater control over public schools and to allow taxpayer dollars to flow toward private ones. In 2021, the state passed a law limiting how Texas schools can teach America鈥檚 history of slavery and racism. The law instructs schools to teach those topics as 鈥渄eviations from, betrayals of, or failures to live up to the authentic founding principles of the United States, which include liberty and equality.鈥�
The governor and top officials in both the Texas House and Senate have made passing a school voucher bill their top priority this legislative session. At the same time, top Texas officials have expressed a desire to in the classroom. Lawmakers have this session that would require schools to display the , which Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has declared a priority. Patrick is also that would grant school districts the power to provide students and employees 鈥渨ith an opportunity to participate in a period of prayer and reading of the Bible or other religious text鈥� every school day.
A nod to Texas lawmakers鈥� aim to also expand so-called parental rights, the DEI bill filed Monday would also allow parents to apply to remove their children from their local school district to attend another. Under currently, a child must attend the school district closest to where the student lives. In SB 12, the district the family applies to could deny the transfer request under certain circumstances, like if it lacks space to accommodate the child or if it has a policy prohibiting students with a criminal background.
This article originally appeared in at .
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.
