University of Texas Regents on Thursday will consider how 鈥渃ontroversial鈥� topics are taught within the UT system.
New guidance being discussed during the board鈥檚 two-day Austin meeting doesn鈥檛 define controversy, but states instructors must 鈥渆xclude unrelated controversial or contested matters鈥� from course material.
鈥淲hen a course includes controversial and contested issues, instructors shall ensure a broad and balanced approach to the discussion and teaching of these issues.鈥�
The chancellor and executive vice chancellor recommend the changes.
The standards stem in part from a new law, Senate Bill 37, that gives more control to a school鈥檚 appointed governing board, and less to the faculty. It comes as the state asserts more influence on college classrooms.
Supporters of the law say it eliminates some unnecessary classes students must take.
UT El Paso political science student Paula Martinez told the House Higher Education Committee last May that some of her 鈥渞equired courses鈥� pushed liberal views all unrelated to her major.
鈥�I believe college should be about critical thinking, not ideological conformity. Yet, in my experience, I've never been assigned a conservative, moderate, or even classical liberal perspective,鈥� she said. That's not education, it's indoctrination."
But opponents of the new guidance worry it will lead to censorship.
Ravi Prakash teaches computer science at the University of Texas at Dallas. He鈥檚 also a former Faculty Senate member.
He said he believes limiting controversial topics will diminish a students鈥� education.
鈥淚f students don鈥檛 know how to engage in such complex topics in college,鈥� he said, 鈥渨here will they learn?鈥�
Bill Zeeble is 四虎影院鈥檚 education reporter. Got a tip? Email Bill at bzeeble@kera.org. You can follow him on X .
四虎影院 is made possible through the generosity of our members. If you find this reporting valuable, consider . Thank you.
