As a Delta Air Lines jet began roaring down a runway, an air traffic controller at New York's suddenly blurted out an expletive, then ordered the pilots to stop their takeoff roll.
The controller saw an American Airlines plane mistakenly crossing the same runway, into the path of the accelerating Delta jet. JFK is one of only 35 U.S. airports with to track planes and vehicles on the ground. The system alerted the to the danger, possibly saving lives last year.
The National Transportation Safety Board and many independent experts say pilots should get warnings without waiting precious seconds to get word from controllers. Just last week, the NTSB recommended that the collaborate with manufacturers to develop technology for alerting pilots directly.
, a conglomerate with a big aerospace business, has been working on such an early-warning system for about 15 years and thinks it is close to a finished product. The company gave a demonstration during a test flight last week. As pilot Joe Duval aimed a Boeing 757 for a runway in Tyler, Texas, a warning appeared on his display and sounded : 鈥淭raffic on runway!鈥�
The system had detected a business jet that was just appearing as a speck on the runway about a mile away 鈥� ground the Boeing would cover in a matter of seconds.
Duval tilted the plane's nose up and pushed the throttle forward into a G-force-inducing climb, safely away from the Dassault Falcon 900 below.
Honeywell officials claim their technology would have alerted the Delta pilots who had the at JFK 13 seconds before the air traffic controller screamed the expletive and told them to stop their takeoff. Merely removing the need for a controller to relay the warning from ground-based systems could be critical.
鈥淭hose are microseconds, but they are enough to make a difference,鈥� Michael McCormick, a former FAA official who now teaches air-traffic management at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida, said. 鈥淧roviding alerts directly to the cockpit is the next step. This puts the tool in the hands of the pilot who actually has control of the aircraft. This technology is a game-changer."
Honeywell plans to layer the cockpit-alert system on top of technology that is already in wide use and warns pilots if they fly too low.
Incidents like the one at JFK are called 鈥� a plane or ground vehicle is on a runway when it shouldn鈥檛 be. Some incursions are caused by pilots entering a runway without clearance from air traffic controllers. In other cases, there isn't enough spacing between planes that are landing or taking off, which can be the fault of pilots or controllers.
The number of incursions fell during the coronavirus pandemic and has not returned to the recent peaks of more than 2,000 incidents recorded in both 2016 and 2017. However, the most serious ones 鈥� where a collision was narrowly avoided or there was a 鈥渟ignificant potential鈥� for a crash 鈥� have been rising since 2017. There were 23 in the United States last year, up from 16 in 2022, according to FAA statistics.
Reducing incursions has always been a priority for FAA 鈥渂ecause that鈥檚 where the greatest risk lies in the aviation system,鈥� said McCormick, the former FAA official.
The worst accident in aviation history occurred in 1977 on the Spanish island of Tenerife, when a KLM 747 began its takeoff roll while a Pan Am 747 was still on the runway; 583 people died when the planes collided in thick fog.
Earlier this year, a Japan Airlines jet landing in Tokyo that was preparing to take off. Five crew members on the coast guard plane died, but all 379 people on board the airliner escaped before it was .
The FAA has paid for designed to reduce incursions, such as reconfiguring confusing taxiways. It has also paid for technology to alert people in the control tower when a plane is lined up to land on a taxiway instead of a runway.
That type of landing error nearly happened in 2017 in San Francisco, when an Air Canada jet to avoid crashing into four jets on the taxiway that were carrying about 1,000 passengers between them.
The FAA is also rolling out more simulators for controllers to practice directing traffic during times of low visibility. The NTSB last week recommended that the FAA require annual refresher training. The suggestion came after the NTSB determined that a a catastrophic crash between a FedEx plane and a Southwest Airlines jet during heavy fog in Austin, Texas, last year had not trained for low-visibility conditions in at least two years.
The NTSB's examination of the February 2023 also renewed attention on technology to provide cockpit warnings of possible incursions and included a brief reference to the system Honeywell is developing. The FAA has not certified the system, which Honeywell calls 鈥淪urf-A鈥� for surface alerts, but the company thinks certification could happen in the next 18 months.
The FAA鈥檚 best technology against runway incursions is a system called ASDE-X that lets controllers track planes and vehicles on the ground. But it is expensive, so it鈥檚 only at 35 of the 520 U.S. airports with a control tower.
鈥淪ome people thought ASDE-X was the solution,鈥� former NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt said. 鈥淭he problem is, there are a lot more than 35 air-carrier airports. A product (that warns pilots in the cockpit) goes to every airport that the airplane goes to.鈥�
Honeywell, which is based in Charlotte, North Carolina, began working on a cockpit warning system around 2008 and tried to convince airlines to support the idea, but it says it found no takers. The company suspended the project when the pandemic devastated aviation in 2020.
Then, as air travel recovered early last year, there were high-profile close calls between planes at major U.S. airports, including the ones at JFK and Austin鈥揃ergstrom International Airport.
鈥淭raffic was picking up. You were having more of the near-misses," said Thea Feyereisen, part of the Honeywell team working on the system. The timing was right to revive the warning system.
鈥淧reviously, when we would talk to airlines, they were not interested. Last year, we go talk to the airlines again, and now they鈥檙e interested," she said.
Still, Honeywell doesn鈥檛 have a launch customer, and company officials won鈥檛 say how much it would cost to outfit a plane.
Feyereisen was asked if the system would have prevented the close calls in New York and Austin.
鈥淲hat our lawyers tell us to say (is) we reduce the risk of a runway incursion. We provide the pilot more time to make a decision鈥� whether to, for example, call off a landing and fly around the airport instead, she said. 鈥淪till, the pilot needs to make a decision.鈥�
