After single-family homeowners voraciously opposed a Dallas land use plan that they claim could have brought more multi-family housing units to their neighborhoods, Dallas City Council members are now poised to vote on something very different.
The council is slated to vote on the Forward Dallas 2.0 land plan during Wednesday鈥檚 meeting, a plan that has taken many forms over the past year and generated a lot of controversy.
Fears that protections for single-family neighborhoods across the city could be lost if the plan passed have featured predominately in the debate. And some residents also claimed that could bring more crime to their neighborhoods.
鈥淪ingle-family zoning is a huge promise to homeowners that is on the chopping block with this latest Dallas Forward 2.0 plan,鈥� Ed Zahra, a district 14 resident, said during an early-September Economic Development Committee meeting. 鈥淭hey expected the city to persevere single-family zoning and is the main reason people buy homes and pay more for them in those districts.鈥�
In early September, in an act of compromise, elected officials voted to send an amended version of the land use plan to the entire council for a final decision.
Dallas city officials have said all along the plan 鈥渄oes not, and legally cannot, eliminate single-family zoning.鈥� But some versions of the plan did allow for more multi-family housing in mostly single-famly neighborhoods.
Now, supporters of the plan 鈥� which has been edited, updated and morphed several times over the last few months 鈥� say it can be a meaningful resource that touches more aspects of the city than just housing.
鈥淭he way we use our land determines how we live, how we get to work, how we interact with our neighborhoods,鈥� Nate Hemby, a data engineer and District 4 resident, told 四虎影院. 鈥淥ne of the positives of defining the way we use the land is it鈥檚 going to define how people get to and from your land.鈥�
Hemby said he supports the plan because he wants to see more housing variety in his neighborhood 鈥� and when he went to buy a home, he said he couldn鈥檛 find what he wanted in his preferred location.
A threat to neighborhoods?
The compromise version came after months of debate between single-family homeowner advocates and those looking for more housing options 鈥� even in established areas of the city.
Homeowners showed up to public hearings, community and city meetings to voice their concerns over what could happen to what they call 鈥渆stablished鈥� neighborhoods, without stricter guidance in Forward Dallas.
鈥淚鈥檓 struggling to understand why the needs of projected statistical residents would be given priority over existing homeowners 鈥� 鈥渕any who have lived here for ten, twenty, thirty years, pay taxes and work to create Dallas鈥� wonderful neighborhoods,鈥� Matt Bach, a Dallas resident, said during a late-July City Plan Commission public hearing.
Bach said at the time the plan has some useful functions but lacked concrete protections for single-family homeowners.
District 12 Council Member Cara Mendelsohn has said in the past that single-family neighborhoods are the city鈥檚 most stable areas.
鈥淎re you aware of what the highest crime rate areas are in our city?鈥� Mendelsohn asked at a late-August Special Called Economic Development Committee meeting. 鈥淚t鈥檚 multi-family housing, and it鈥檚 not just number one, its number one by far.鈥�
Mendelsohn said at the time that people deserve to have an option of single-family housing only. And other residents voiced similar concerns.
Both sides of the issue agree that there are legitimate fears associated with the plan. They just disagree on what those are.
鈥淚 think the fear that say someone is going to come into your neighborhood and raze all the homes overnight and put in a five over one, is definitely overblown,鈥� Hemby said. 鈥淏ut I do get鈥here is a fear of displacement.鈥�
Hemby added that regardless of what happens with Forward Dallas, 鈥渢hose neighborhoods are going to change as is.鈥�
Peter Cioe, the founder and owner of Community Focused Ventures and CFV Construction, is a partial owner in the building he rents and lives in.
He rents in a mostly single-family neighborhood in southern Dallas. He said his neighbors 鈥渓ook out for each other, there is no animosity towards people for being a renter versus a homeowner.鈥�
But Cioe told 四虎影院 some of the conversation related to renters and Forward Dallas has been 鈥渄isturbing.鈥�
鈥淚t鈥檚 not just the citizens and the single-family homeowners, it鈥檚 also by city council members,鈥� Cioe said. 鈥淚t鈥檚鈥ehumanizing.鈥�
That includes how renters have been referred to 鈥� and what amenities are associated with renters versus single-family homeowners.
Cioe said rentals should be in areas with amenities on par with single-family neighborhoods, 鈥溾�nd not stuck up off the highway or anywhere they want to cluster apartment complexes.
鈥淸Renters] should have the opportunity to be close to good schools, and not have to commute and drive,鈥� he said.
A compromise
Council members say they decided to compromise, citing residents鈥� fears that too many multi-family units would end up in their single-family neighborhoods.
Members of the Economic Development Committee voted in early September to approve Forward Dallas 2.0 and to move the plan to the final stage of the process 鈥� a full city council vote.
After District 14 Council Member Paul Ridley offered up a slew of amendments during the meeting, the proposed Forward Dallas 2.0 land plan was amended to include more rules around what happens in the city鈥檚 single-family zoned areas.
鈥淐onsistently our resident鈥檚 pleas for more housing options and also for protection of their existing neighborhoods and single-family neighborhoods,鈥� Ridley said during the meeting. 鈥淚t has become clear to me that those objects are not incompatible in the context of Forward Dallas 2.0.鈥�
But Ridley said the plan at time put 鈥渂urden of adding density鈥� on the city鈥檚 single-family areas.
He proposed what he calls a 鈥渃ompromise document鈥� to address what he viewed as issues with the plan. Most council members agreed with the plan鈥檚 edits.
Ridley added a section to mandate that 鈥渋ncompatible multiplex, townhome, duplex, triplex and apartment development should be located outside of existing single-family neighborhoods.鈥�
Another proposed edit said 鈥渄ensity in the form of multiplexes should be prioritized along arterials, not neighborhood streets.鈥�
So, where do new housing options go?
鈥淧roperties near transit stations and along commercial corridors, transition areas between non-residential and existing residential areas, former civic institutional properties, and underutilized shopping centers should be considered for adding these alternative housing types,鈥� Ridley said during the meeting.
Ridley鈥檚 compromise also stipulated that developers should provide 鈥渧isual buffers between single family uses and other more intense adjoining uses.鈥�
Not a difficult concept?
Committee members agreed with the proposal 鈥� but some said these proposals shouldn鈥檛 have been needed in the first place.
鈥淚 believe that the conversation around single-family zoning and neighborhoods should have never been a difficult concept to understand and fight for,鈥� District 4 Council Member Carolyn King Arnold said in early September. 鈥淚t has taken us so long to grasp the importance of single-family zoning and the need to protect it.鈥�
Arnold said city officials sometimes embrace trends鈥� or 鈥渇ads,鈥� 鈥� this should not be one of them.
鈥淩ight now, single-family [neighborhoods] in a major city is one of those things that we should not experiment with, as if this were a science fair project,鈥� Arnold said.
District 1 Council Member Chad West said the plan could do more to address the city鈥檚 housing need but 鈥渋n the spirit of compromise鈥� he would support Ridley鈥檚 document. West also said the edits address some of his constituents鈥� biggest fears.
鈥淭hat is, the fear of new housing stock coming in and being not compatible,鈥� West said. 鈥淎nd the other piece which cannot be stressed enough is the鈥ustifiable fear of displacement of residents and demolition of homes.鈥�
West shared examples of houses being sold in his district with descriptions encouraging potential buyers to tear down the existing home and put up something new. He said the price of the home, plus demolition and a rebuild would likely result in a multi-million-dollar house, 鈥渋n an area where you currently have affordable housing stock,鈥� according to West.
Ultimately, the plan is just that 鈥� a plan. City staff hopes to use the document to guide new development, but it鈥檚 just the first step in a larger process.
鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 change anything on the ground today, it lays out a vision so when the city looks at zoning down the road, they can look at it through the lens of this plan,鈥� Cioe told 四虎影院. 鈥淚 think it would have a positive impact on the city of Dallas.鈥�
City staff says implementing the plan will take some time if it鈥檚 approved.
Got a tip? Email Nathan Collins at ncollins@kera.org. You can follow Nathan on Twitter .
四虎影院 is made possible through the generosity of our members. If you find this reporting valuable, consider today. Thank you.
